Regional determinants of residential energy expenditures and the principal-agent problem in Austria
AbstractThe aim of this paper is two-fold: 1) to examine the determinants of residential energy expenditures and compare them on a regional level; and, 2) attempt to identify and measure the effect of possible principal-agent (PA) problems on residential energy efficiency in Austria. The results of this paper are partially based on findings from a master’s thesis, which focused more directly on the PA problem. This paper expands on those results to include regional aspects in energy expenditures. A conditional demand model is regressed on a large number of variables representing housing characteristics, socio-economic factors, occupancy type, and regional characteristics sourced from the EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions dataset. The analysis indicates that significant regional differences exist in the determinants of residential energy expenditures and that PA problems appear to be unimportant to energy efficiency in Austria, even at the regional level. It concludes with some possible explanations as to why this is the case.
Austrian Energy Agency (2011). Second National Energy Efficiency Action Plan of the Republic of Austria 2011. Vienna: Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth.
Austrian Energy Agency (2012a). Energy Efficiency Policies and Measures in Austria in 2010, ODYSSEE-MURE 2010: Monitoring of EU and National Energy Efficiency Targets. Vienna: Austrian Energy Agency.
Austrian Energy Agency (2012b). Energy Efficiency Profile: Austria, ODYSSEE-MURE Country Profiles. Vienna: Austrian Energy Agency.
Baker, P., Blundell, R., & Micklewright, J. (1989). Modelling household energy expenditures using micro-data. The Economic Journal, 99(397), 720–738.
Bannock, G., Baxter, R. E., & Davis, E. (1992). The Penguin Dictionary of Economics. London: Penguin Books.
Bernard, J.-T., Bolduc, D., & Bélanger, D. (1996). Quebec residential electricity demand: a microeconometric approach. Canadian Journal of Economics, 29(1), 92–113.
Bird, S., & Hernández, D. (2012). Policy options for the split incentive: Increasing energy efficiency for low-income renters. Energy Policy, 48, 506–514.
Blumstein, C., Krieg, B., Schipper, L., & York, C. (1980). Overcoming social and institutional barriers to energy conservation. Energy, 5(4), 355–371.
Branch, E. R. (1993). Short Run Income Elasticity of Demand for Residential Electricity Using Consumer Expenditure Survey Data. Energy Journal, 14(4), 111–121.
Braun, F. G. (2010). Determinants of households’ space heating type: A discrete choice analysis for German households. Energy Policy, 38(10), 5493–5503.
Brounen, D., Kok, N., & Quigley, J. M. (2012). Residential energy use and conservation: Economics and demographics. European Economic Review, 56(5), 931–945.
Brown, M. A. (2001). Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies. Energy Policy, 29(14), 1197–1207.
Charlier, D. (2012). Energy efficiency and split incentives in the residential sector: the landlord tenant problem.
Davis, L. W. (2010). Evaluating the slow adoption of energy efficient investments: are renters less likely to have energy efficient appliances? (Working Paper 16114). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Dubin, J. A., & McFadden, D. L. (1984). An econometric analysis of residential electric appliance holdings and consumption. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 52(2), 345–362.
Garbacz, C. (1983). A model of residential demand for electricity using a national household sample. Energy Economics, 5(2), 124–128.
Gartland, L. (2008). Heat Islands: Understanding and Mitigating Heat in Urban Areas. London: Earthscan.
Gillingham, K., Harding, M., & Rapson, D. (2012). Split Incentives in Residential Energy Consumption. The Energy Journal, 33(2).
Gillingham, K., Newell, R. G., & Palmer, K. (2009). Energy efficiency economics and policy (15031), Working Paper. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Golove, W. H., & Eto, J. H. (1996). Market barriers to energy efficiency: a critical reappraisal of the rationale for public policies to promote energy efficiency (LBL-38059). Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Green, R. D. (1987). Regional variations in US consumer response to price changes in home heating fuels: the Northeast and the South. Applied Economics, 19, 1261–1268.
Halvorsen, R. & Palmquist, R. (1980). The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations. The American Economics Review, 70(3), 474-475.
Hayes, A. F., & Cai, L. (2007). Using heteroskedasticity-consistent standard error estimators in OLS regression: An introduction and software implementation. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 709–722.
Hirst, E., & Brown, M. A. (1990). Closing the efficiency gap: barriers to the efficient use of energy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 3(4), 267–281.
Hirst, E., Goeltz, R., & Carney, J. (1982). Residential energy use: analysis of disaggregate data. Energy Economics, 4(2), 74–82.
Howarth, R. B., & Andersson, B. (1993). Market barriers to energy efficiency. Energy Economics, 263–272.
IEA (2007). Mind the Gap - Quantifying Principal-Agent Problems in Energy Efficiency. Paris: International Energy Agency.
Jaffe, A., & Stavins, R. (1994). The energy-efficiency gap: What does it mean? Energy Policy, 22(10), 804–810.
Lee, R.-S., & Singh, N. (1994). Patterns in residential gas and electricity consumption: an econometric analysis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 12, 233–241.
Leth-Petersen, S., & Togeby, M. (2001). Demand for space heating in apartment blocks: measuring effects of policy measures aiming at reducing energy consumption. Energy Economics, 23(4), 387–403.
Liao, H.-C., & Chang, T.-F. (2002). Space-heating and water-heating energy demands of the aged in the US. Energy Economics, 24(3), 267–284.
Linares, P., & Labandeira, X. (2010). Energy Efficiency: Economics and Policy. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(3), 573–592.
Meier, A., & Eide, A. (2007). How many people actually see the price signal? Quantifying market failures in the end use of energy. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Meier, H., & Rehdanz, K. (2010). Determinants of residential space heating expenditures in Great Britain. Energy Economics, 32(5), 949–959.
Murtishaw, S., & Sathaye, J. (2006). Quantifying the Effect of the Principal-Agent Problem on US Residential Energy Use (LBNL-59773). Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Nesbakken, R. (2001). Energy consumption for space heating: a discrete–continuous approach. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 103(1), 165–184.
Osborne, J. W. (2010). Improving your data transformations: Applying the Box-Cox transformation. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 15(12), 1–9.
Rehdanz, K. (2007). Determinants of residential space heating expenditures in Germany. Energy Economics, 29(2), 167–182.
Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency: The principal’s problem. The American Economic Review, 63(2), 134–139.
Sathaye, J., & Murtishaw, S. (2004). Market failures, consumer preferences, and transaction costs in energy efficiency purchase decisions (LBNL-57318). Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Schaefer, C., Weber, C., Voss-Uhlenbrock, H., Schuler, A., Oosterheis, F., Nieuwlaar, E., … Munksgaard, J. (2000). Effective Policy Instruments for Energy Efficiency in Residential Space Heating - an International Empirical Analysis (EPISODE). Stuttgart, Germany: Institute of Energy Economics and the Rational Use of Energy, University of Stuttgart.
Schuler, A., Weber, C., & Fahl, U. (2000). Energy consumption for space heating of West-German households: empirical evidence, scenario projections and policy implications. Energy Policy, 28(12), 877–894.
Sorrell, S., O’Malley, E., Schleich, J., & Scott, S. (2004). The Economics of Energy Efficiency. Northampton, MA and Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Statistik Austria (2013). Microcensus - Energy balances 1970 to 2011, energy consumption of households, population. Compiled on 5 March 2013.
Sutherland, R. J. (1991). Market Barriers to Energy-Efficiency Investments. Energy Journal, 12(3), 15–34.
Van Raaij, W. F., & Verhallen, T. M. M. (1983). A behavioral model of residential energy use. Journal of Economic Psychology, 3, 39–63.
White, H. (1980). A Heteroskedasticity-Consistant Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48(4), 817–838.
Wilkerson, J. T. (2012). The Energy Gap from Split Incentives in US Residential Appliances. Management Science.
Wood, G., Ong, R., & McMurray, C. (2012). Housing Tenure, Energy Consumption and the Split-Incentive Issue in Australia. International Journal of Housing Policy, 12(4), 439–469.
Wooldridge, J. (2012). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (5th ed.). Cengage Learning.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
REGION is an open journal, and uses the standard Creative Commons license: Copyright We want authors to retain the maximum control over their work consistent with the first goal. For this reason, authors who publish in REGION will release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license. This license allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given to REGION and the authors. For details of the rights authors grant users of their work, see the "human-readable summary" of the license, with a link to the full license. (Note that "you" refers to a user, not an author, in the summary.) Upon submission, the authors agree that the following three items are true: 1) The manuscript named above: a) represents valid work and neither it nor any other that I have written with substantially similar content has been published before in any form except as a preprint, b) is not concurrently submitted to another publication, and c) does not infringe anyone’s copyright. The Author(s) holds ERSA, WU, REGION, and the Editors of REGION harmless against all copyright claims. d) I have, or a coauthor has, had sufficient access to the data to verify the manuscript’s scientific integrity. 2) If asked, I will provide or fully cooperate in providing the data on which the manuscript is based so the editors or their assignees can examine it (where possible) 3) For papers with more than one author, I as the submitter have the permission of the coauthors to submit this work, and all authors agree that the corresponding author will be the main correspondent with the editorial office, and review the edited manuscript and proof. If there is only one author, I will be the corresponding author and agree to handle these responsibilities.