Potentials and limitations for the use of accessibility measures for national transport policy goals in freight transport and logistics: evidence from Västra Götaland County, Sweden

  • Anders Larsson
  • Jerry Olsson
Keywords: Accessibility, freight transport, logistics facilities, transport policy

Abstract

In Swedish national transport policy is freight transport regarded as a major facilitator for economic development on all geographical levels. At the same time it is noted that methods and data on business location and transportation is not adequate in order to follow-up transport policy objectives. This paper reports on a pilot study on the potential to develop accessibility measures to support and follow up policy objectives in Swedish context. The concept of accessibility and its practical use in concrete measures is discussed and problematized. A number of practical examples from Region Västra Götaland are used as illustrations. In terms of results the study identifies a number of potentials and limitations of using accessibility measures for freight transport issues. The usefulness is mainly driven by the integration capability of transport and land-use. This opens up for more complex questions and measures and thus supports the integration between planning specialisations. Limitations are to a large extent related to data availability and quality and to the degree of which models are possible to communicate to non-experts. The concluding discussion highlights how the policy and governance context is key in understanding how to best utilise the potential strengths of the accessibility concept and measures.

References

Allen J, Browne M (2008) Review of survey techniques used in urban freight studies. Transport Studies Group, University of Westminster, London

Banister D (2005) Unsustainable Transport: City Transport in the New Century. Routledge, London

Banister D (2008) The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy 15: 73-80 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005

Barysiene J, Batarliene N, Bazaras D, Ciziuniene K, Griskeviciene D, Griskevicius AJ, Lazauskas J, Maciulis A, Palsaitis R, Vasiliauskas AV, Vasiliene-Vasiliauskiene V (2015) Analysis of the current logistics and transport challenge in the context of the changing environment. Transport 30: 233-241 http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2015.1046403

Berglund S (2001) GIS in transport modelling. PhD dissertation. Department of Infrastructure, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

Bertolini L (2005) Cities and transport: Exploring the need for new planning approaches. In: Albrechts L, Mandelbaum S (eds). The network society: A new context for planning, Routledge, Oxford

Breheny M (1978) The measurement of spatial opportunity in strategic planning. Regional Studies 12: 463-479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09595237800185401

Dablanc L (2013) Commercial goods transport, Paris, France. Case study prepared for Global Report on Human Settlements 2013 http://www.unhabitat.org/grhs/2013

Dablanc L, Ross C (2012) Atlanta: a mega logistics center in the Piedmont Atlantic Megaregion. Journal of Transport Geography 24: 432-42 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.05.001

David PD (2015) Factors affecting municipal land use cooperation. Land Use Policy 42: 170-182 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.013

de Dios Ortúzar J, Willumsen LG (2011) Modelling Transport. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester

Elldér E, Larsson A (2011) Improving regional transport accessibility planning. A GIS-based methodology based on micro-level register data. Regional Studies International Conference. 18-20 April 2011. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Elldér E, Ernstson U, Fransson U, Larsson A (2012a) Analysverktyg för tillgänglighetsberäkning med bil och kollektivtrafik i Västra Götaland. Slutrapport. Occasional Papers 2012:1. Department of Human and Economic Geography, University of Göteborg, Göteborg

Elldér E, Gil Solá A, Larsson A (2012b) Spatial inequality and workplace accessibility. Environment and Planning A 44: 2295-2297

Ferreira A, Beukers E, te Brömmelstroet M (2012) Accessibility is gold, mobility is not: A proposal for the improvement of transport-related Dutch CBA. Environment and Planning B 39: 683-697 doi: 10.1068/b38073

Geertman S, Stillwell J (2004) Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 28: 291-310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0198-9715(03)00024-3

Geurs KT, Ritsema van Eck JR (2001) Accessibility measures: review and applications. RIVM report 408505 006. Netherlands National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven

Geurs KT, van Wee B (2004) Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography 12: 127-140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005

Giuliano G, Dablanc L, Rodrigue J-P, Seo S (2015) Building the database. Final Report Project No.: 15-1A. MetroFreight Center of Excellence, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA

Hägerstrand T (1970) What about people in regional science? Regional Science Association Papers XXIV: 7-21 DOI:10.1111/j.1435-5597.1970.tb01464.x

Handy S (2002) Accessibility- vs. mobility-enhancing strategies for addressing automobile dependence in the U.S. European Conference of Ministers of Transport, Brussels

Hansen WG (1959) How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25: 73-76 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307

Haugen K (2012) The accessibility paradox. GERUM 2012:1. Department of Geography and Economic History,University of Umeå, Umeå

Haugen K, Holm E, Strömgren M, Vilhelmson B, Westin K (2012) Proximity, accessibility and choice: A matter of taste or condition? Papers in Regional Science 91: 65-84 DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00374.x

Haugen K, Vilhelmson B (2013) The divergent role of spatial access: the changing supply and location of service amenities and service travel distance in Sweden. Transportation Research A 49: 10–20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.001

Hesse M (2008) The City as a Terminal. The Urban Context of Logistics and Freight Transport. Ashgate, Aldershot

Ingram DR (1971) The concept of accessibility: A search for an operational form. Regional Studies 5: 101-107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09595237100185131

La Paix L, Geurs K (2016) Train station access and train use: a joint stated and revealed preference choice modelling study. In: Geurs K, Patuelli R, Ponce Dentinho T (eds). Accessibility, equity and efficiency: Challenges for transport and public services, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

Larsson A, Elldér E, Vilhelmson B (2014) Accessibility atlas to analyse regional accessibility to labour in the food sector. In: Brömmelstroet M, Silva C, Bertolini L (eds). Assessing usability of accessibility instruments. Report 2 from the COST Action TU1002, European Science Foundation and the COST Office, Brussels

Lee DBJ (1973) A requiem for large scale models. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 39: 163-178 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944367308977851

Lindström A (2007) Territorial governance in transition. Regional and Federal Studies 17: 499-508 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13597560701691896

Lucas K (2012) Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy 20: 105-113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013

McKinnon A (2009) The present and future land requirements of logistics activities. Land Use Policy 26: 293-301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.014

Melo MT, Nickel S, Saldanha-da-Gama F (2009) Facility location and supply chain management - A review. European Journal of Operational Research 196:

-412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.007

Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation (2011) Framtidens citylogistik. Rapport från arbetsgruppen för citylogistik inom Logistikforum. Näringsdepartementet, Stockholm

Olsson J, Larsson A (2016) Accessibility to terminals in Västra Götland - a pilot study. PM 2016:9, Transport Analysis, Stockholm http://www.trafa.se/globalassets/pm/pm-2016_9-tillganglighet-till-terminaler-i-vastra-gotaland--en-pilotstudie.pdf:

Olsson J, Woxenius J (2012) Location of freight consolidation centres serving the city and its surroundings. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 39: 293-306 doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.109

Olsson J, Woxenius J (2014) Localisation of freight consolidation centres serving small road hauliers in a wider urban area: barriers for more efficient freight deliveries in Gothenburg. Journal of Transport Geography 34: 25-33

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.10.016

Rodrigue J-P, Comtois C, Slack B (2013) The Geography of Transport Systems. Routledge, Abingdon

Sakai T, Kawamura K, Hyodo T (2015) Locational dynamics of logistics facilities: Evidence from Tokyo. Journal of Transport Geography 46: 10-19

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.05.003

Sheffi Y (2012) Logistics Clusters. Delivering Value and Delivering Growth. MIT Press, Cambridge

SOU (Statens Offentliga Utredningar) (2008) Vägen till ett energieffektivare Sverige. Slutbetänkande av Energieffektiviseringsutredningen, SPU 200:110

Straatemeier T (2008) How to plan for regional accessibility? Transport Policy 15: 127-137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.002

Swedish Government Bill (2008/9) Framtidens resor och transporter – infrastruktur för hållbar tillväxt. Regeringens Proposition 2008/09:35

Swedish Transport Administration (2013) Godskartläggning i VG. Rapport 2013:151. Trafikverket, Borlänge

te Brömmelstroet M (2010) Equip the warrior instead of manning the equipment: Land use and transport planning support in the Netherlands. Journal of Transport and Land Use 3: 25-41 http://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.343141

Transport Analysis (2013a) Indikatorer för en transportpolitisk måluppföljning – hur tillgänglighet påverkarkonkurrens- och utvecklingskraft. Trafikanalys:

Stockholm

Transport Analysis (2013b) Transportarbete 1950–2012. Trafikanalys: Stockholm.

http://www.trafa.se/sv/Statistik/Transportarbete/ [accessed 2014-05-05]

Transport Analysis (2013) Indikatorer för en transportpolitisk måluppföljning måluppföljning – hur tillgänglighet påverkar konkurrens- och utvecklingskraft. Rapport 2013:2. Trafikanalys, Stockholm

WSP (2013) Methodology for the identification of freight terminals in Sweden. (in Swedish). Internal Report. WSP, Stockholm

Published
2017-05-15
How to Cite
Larsson, A. and Olsson, J. (2017) “Potentials and limitations for the use of accessibility measures for national transport policy goals in freight transport and logistics: evidence from Västra Götaland County, Sweden”, REGION, 4(1), pp. 71-92. doi: 10.18335/region.v4i1.172.
Section
Articles
Share