The Role of Institutional Environment in International Trade. The Case of Spanish Regions
Keywords:Trade Agreements, Institutional Environment, Trade Flows, Regions, Gravity Equation, Quantile Regression
We move beyond the nation-state as the unit of analysis and use subnational spatial variation to study the effect of the institutional environment on international trade. Additionally, we address the heterogeneous effect of trade agreements on different regions within a country. Employing a gravity model approach, we use a region-to-country dataset to estimate the determinants of Spanish regional exports and we apply quantile regressions for panel data. We find that better institutional quality of trade agreements leads to an increase in both the intensive and the extensive margins of trade. The institutional quality of trade agreements exerts a differential effect on regional exports at different locations within a country, although differences across Spanish regions seem to be larger for the intensive margin than for the extensive margin. We do, however, find a common trend: for the relatively more important exporting regions, the institutional quality of TAs is less relevant for trade margins. Therefore, our results posit that subnational spatial variation should be added to the analysis of the determinants of international trade flows.
Alamá-Sabater, L., Heid, B., Jiménez-Fernández, E. and Márquez-Ramos, L. (2016): “What drives interdependence of FDI among host countries? The role of geographic proximity and similarity in public debt.” Economic Modelling 58, 466-474.
Anderson, J. E. and van Wincoop, E. (2003): “Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle.” The American Economic Review 93(1), 170-192.
Baier, S. L., Bergstrand, J. H. and Feng, M. (2014): “Economic integration agreements and the margins of international trade.” Journal of International Economics 93(2), 339-350.
Baldwin, R. and Taglioni, D. (2006): “Gravity for Dummies and Dummies for Gravity Equations.” NBER Working Papers 12516, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Bensassi, S., Márquez-Ramos, L. and Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2012): “Economic integration and the two margins of trade: the impact of the Barcelona Process on North African countries' exports.” Journal of African Economies 21(2), 228-265.
Beugelsdijk, S. and Mudambi, R. (2013): “MNEs as border-crossing multi-location enterprises: The role of discontinuities in geographic space.” Journal of International Business Studies 44(5), 413-426.
Cantwell, J., Dunning, J. H. and Lundan, S. M. (2010): “An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment.” Journal of International Business Studies 41(4), 567-586.
Carrère, C. (2006): “Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model.” European Economic Review 50(2), 223-247.
Charron, N., Lapuente, V. and Dykstra, L. (2014): “Regional Governance Matters: A Study on Regional Variation in Quality of Government within the EU.” Regional Studies 48 (1), 68-90.
Cipollina, M. and Salvatici, L. (2010): “Reciprocal Trade Agreements in Gravity Models: A Meta-Analysis.” Review of International Economics 18 (1), 63-80.
Cohen, B. C. (1963): The Press and Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dufour, J. M. (2016): “Exogeneity Tests and IV Estimation: Is the Cure Worse Than the Illness?” Paper presented at the Workshop of the School of Economics. University of Adelaide. November.
Engelhardt, T. (2015): “Geographical Indications Under Recent EU Trade Agreements.” IIC-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 46(7), 781-818.
European Commission (2015): “Online public consultation on investment protection and investor-to-state dispute settlement (ISDS) in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership Agreement (TTIP).” Commission staff working document, January 2015. Available at http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2015/january/tradoc_153044.pdf
Figueiredo, E., Lima, L. R., and Schaur, G. (2016): “The effect of the Euro on the bilateral trade distribution.” Empirical Economics 50(1), 17-29.
Florensa, L. M., Márquez-Ramos, L. and Recalde, M. L. (2015): “The effect of economic integration and institutional quality of trade agreements on trade margins: Evidence for Latin America.” Review of World Economics 151(2), 329-351.
Head, K., and Mayer, T. (2014): “Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook.” In Handbook on International Economics, Vol. 4, Elsevier-North-Holland, 131-195.
Hillberry, R. and Hummels, D. (2008): “Trade responses to geographic frictions: A decomposition using micro-data.” European Economic Review 52(3), 527-550.
Hummels, D. and Klenow, P. J. (2005): “The variety and quality of a nation's exports.” The American Economic Review 95(3), 704-723.
Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. Jr. (1978): “Regression quantiles.” Econometrica 46(1): 33–50.
Koenker, R. (2004): “Quantile regression for longitudinal data.” Journal of Multivariate Analysis 91(1): 74–89.
Kohl, T., S. Brakman and J.H. Garretsen (2013): “Do international trade agreements stimulate trade differently? Evidence from 296 trade agreements.” CESifo Working Paper No. 4243.
Márquez-Ramos, L. (2016a): “Regionalism, subnational variation and gravity: A four-country tale.” Journal of Regional Research 35, 7-36.
Márquez-Ramos, L. (2016b): “Port Facilities, Regional Spillovers and Exports: Empirical Evidence from Spain.” Papers in Regional Science 95(2), 329-351.
Márquez-Ramos, L., Florensa, L. M. and Recalde, M. L. (2015): “Economic Integration Effects on Trade Margins: Sectoral Evidence from Latin America.” Journal of Economic Integration 30 (2), 269-299.
Meyer, K. E., Mudambi, R. and Narula, R. (2011): “Multinational enterprises and local contexts: the opportunities and challenges of multiple embeddedness.” Journal of Management Studies 48(2), 235-252.
Nyman-Metcalf, K. and Papageorgiou, I. (2016): “The Right for Regional Integration Organisations to Protect Democracy: Legitimacy at the Regional Level?” Baltic Journal of European Studies 6(1), 28-47.
Peiró-Palomino, J. and Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2013): “Can trust effects on development be generalized? A response by quantile.” European Journal of Political Economy 32, 377-390.
Santos-Silva, J. and Tenreyro, S. (2006): “The log of gravity.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 88(4), 641-658.
Santos-Silva, J., Tenreyro, S. and Wei, K. (2014): “Estimating the extensive margin of trade.” Journal of International Economics 93(1), 67-75.
Soroka, S. N. (2003): “Media, public opinion, and foreign policy.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 8(1), 27-48.
The Economist (2013): “Europe’s reluctant hegemon.” Special Report, June 15th-21st. http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21579140-germany-now-dominant-country-europe-needs-rethink-way-it-sees-itself-and
How to Cite
REGION is an open journal, and uses the standard Creative Commons license: Copyright We want authors to retain the maximum control over their work consistent with the first goal. For this reason, authors who publish in REGION will release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license. This license allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given to REGION and the authors. For details of the rights authors grant users of their work, see the "human-readable summary" of the license, with a link to the full license. (Note that "you" refers to a user, not an author, in the summary.) Upon submission, the authors agree that the following three items are true: 1) The manuscript named above: a) represents valid work and neither it nor any other that I have written with substantially similar content has been published before in any form except as a preprint, b) is not concurrently submitted to another publication, and c) does not infringe anyone’s copyright. The Author(s) holds ERSA, WU, REGION, and the Editors of REGION harmless against all copyright claims. d) I have, or a coauthor has, had sufficient access to the data to verify the manuscript’s scientific integrity. 2) If asked, I will provide or fully cooperate in providing the data on which the manuscript is based so the editors or their assignees can examine it (where possible) 3) For papers with more than one author, I as the submitter have the permission of the coauthors to submit this work, and all authors agree that the corresponding author will be the main correspondent with the editorial office, and review the edited manuscript and proof. If there is only one author, I will be the corresponding author and agree to handle these responsibilities.