Research infrastructure, networks of science and regional development - the case of Oskarshamn
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v4i3.143Keywords:
Extenalities, EnvironmentAbstract
Final deposit of nuclear waste is a a global engineering challenge. The Swedish nuclear industry has spent more than thirty years in investigating the best sites and technologies for the final storage of nuclear waste. Universities have been involved as experts in this massive R&D activity. The result has been a well-documented body of knowledge for decision support. At the same time global research infrastructure networks have been developed. More than 140 PhD theses have been produced as one of the outputs. Eleven of these PhD holders are now full professors.
Based on earlier work on research infrastructures Lund, Hamburg, and Kiruna, see for instance Snickars and Falck (2015), we have addressed the question of the role of a technical research infrastructure for the development of fields of engineering and natural science at the same time generating regional development. It has provided an opportunity to empirically study the use of research infrastructure in a specialized technology field. At the same time the study investigates a municipality’s efforts to specialize in research without a university in the vicinity.
Do networks of cooperation differ between research groups and research infrastructures? Can a region build its smart specialization on research infrastructure? Can research equipment once belonging to a company be transformed to a public research infrastructure asset?
Our results indicate that research infrastructures as the ones in Oskarshamn are powerful creators of international research networks. It is possible although somewhat difficult in view of scattered systems for data provision to assess their academic and societal impacts. Engineering research has its own networks of university-industry and industry-university interaction where value is cogenerated dynamically. In the study we have come some way towards empirically analyzing the networks of research cooperation between industry and university using methods of infrastructure theory and network analysis.
References
Andersson ÅE, Beckmann M. (2009) Economics of knowledge: Theory, models and measurements. Elgar
Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media
Batabyal A, Nijkamp P (2015) Creative capital in production, inefficiency, and inequality - a theoretical analysis. Paper presented at an International Workshop, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam
Falck S, Snickars F, Westlund H (2011) Research hubs in the Baltic Sea Region: An explorative study about research cooperation and the usage of research facilities in physics and life sciences. Research paper, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) and the Swedish Research Council (VR)
Florida R (2002) The economic geography of talent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92(4): 743-755
Freeman L (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40: 35–41
Horlings E, Gurney T, Somers A, van den Besselaar P (2012) The societal footprint of big science - A literature review in support of evidence-based decision making. Working paper 1206, Rathenau Instituut, Den Haag
Johansson B, Quigley JM (2004) Agglomeration and networks in spatial economies. Papers in Regional Science 83: 1-13
Mellander C, Florida R (2007) The creative class or human capital? - explaining regional development in Sweden. Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 79, Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, KTH
Nova FoU (2015) Annual Report 2014. Technical Report 2015-10-01
Nuclear Energy Agency (2012) The post-closure radiological safety case for a spent-fuel repository in Sweden. An international peer review of the SKB license-application study of March 2011. NEA/RWM/PEER(2012)2, OECD, Paris
OECD (2012), OECD Territorial Reviews, Småland – Blekinge. Research Report, OECD, Paris
SKB (1994) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 1993. Technical Report TR-94-11
SKB (1995) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 1994. Technical Report TR-95-07
SKB (1996) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 1995. Technical Report TR-96-06
SKB (1997) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 1996. Technical Report TR-97-08
SKB (1998) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 1997. Technical Report TR-98-19
SKB (1999) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 1998. Technical Report TR-99-10
SKB (2000) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 1999. Technical Report TR-00-10
SKB (2001) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 2000. Technical Report TR-01-10
SKB (2002) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 2001. Technical Report TR-02-10
SKB (2003) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 2002. Technical Report TR-03-10
SKB (2004) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 2003. Technical Report TR-04-10
SKB (2005) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 2004. Technical Report TR-05-10
SKB (2006) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 2005. Technical Report TR-06-10
SKB (2007) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 2006. Technical Report TR-07-10
SKB (2008) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 2007. Technical Report TR-08-10
SKB (2009) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 2008. Technical Report TR-09-10
SKB (2010) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 2009. Technical Report TR-10-10
SKB (2011) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 2010. Technical Report TR-11-10
SKB (2012) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 2011. Technical Report TR-12-03
SKB (2013a) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 2012. Technical Report TR-13-10
SKB (2013b) RD&D Programme 2013. Technical Report, TR-13-18
SKB (2014) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 2013. Technical Report TR-14-17
SKB (2015) Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory Annual Report 2014. Technical Report TR-15-10
Snickars F, Falck S (2015), Inter-regional trade in research-based knowledge: The case of the EISCAT radar system. In Batabyal A, Nijkamp P (eds), The region and trade: New analytical directions: 227-264
Snickars F, Blaus J, Eriksson T, Reitberger G (2013) Economic and social impacts of KTH research: A follow-up study of the Research Assessment Exercise 2012. Research report, VINNOVA and KTH
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Folke Valfrid Snickars, Ulf Karlsson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
REGION is an open journal, and uses the standard Creative Commons license: Copyright We want authors to retain the maximum control over their work consistent with the first goal. For this reason, authors who publish in REGION will release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution license. This license allows anyone to copy and distribute the article provided that appropriate attribution is given to REGION and the authors. For details of the rights authors grant users of their work, see the "human-readable summary" of the license, with a link to the full license. (Note that "you" refers to a user, not an author, in the summary.) Upon submission, the authors agree that the following three items are true: 1) The manuscript named above: a) represents valid work and neither it nor any other that I have written with substantially similar content has been published before in any form except as a preprint, b) is not concurrently submitted to another publication, and c) does not infringe anyone’s copyright. The Author(s) holds ERSA, WU, REGION, and the Editors of REGION harmless against all copyright claims. d) I have, or a coauthor has, had sufficient access to the data to verify the manuscript’s scientific integrity. 2) If asked, I will provide or fully cooperate in providing the data on which the manuscript is based so the editors or their assignees can examine it (where possible) 3) For papers with more than one author, I as the submitter have the permission of the coauthors to submit this work, and all authors agree that the corresponding author will be the main correspondent with the editorial office, and review the edited manuscript and proof. If there is only one author, I will be the corresponding author and agree to handle these responsibilities.
