Happiness in Romanian cities on the road from post-communism transition to EU accession
The literature on life satisfaction in transition countries, and in particular on Romania, demonstrated that life satisfaction significantly differs across rural communities and cities of different size. The question addressed in this paper is whether these imbalances are stable over time or, instead, they become manifest in the presence of strong divergences in the economic growth rates of different kinds of communities. Results point out that in the period of sharp economic growth led by large urban areas, as the one experienced by Romania on the road to EU accession, rural/urban disparities in life satisfaction widened, favoring cities of intermediate size.
Andrén D, Martinsson P (2006) What Contributes to Life Satisfaction in Transitional Romania? Review of Development Economics 10(1): 59-70.
Berry BJL, Okulicz-Kozaryn A (2009) Dissatisfaction with life cities. Cities 29: 117-127.
Blanchflower DG, Freeman RB (1997) The attitudinal legacy of communist labor relations. Industrial & Labor Relations Review 50(3): 438-459.
Blanchflower DG, Oswald AJ (2011) International happiness: A new view on the measure of performance. The Academy of Management Perspectives 25(1): 6-22.
Camagni R, Capello R, Caragliu A ( 2015) Agglomeration economies in large versus small cities: similar laws, high specifities, in Kourtit K, Nijkamp P, Stough R (eds). The rise of the city: spatial dynamics in the urban century, Edward Elgar, Cheltenam, UK, 85–113.
Di Tella R, MacCulloch, R (2008) Gross national happiness as an answer to the Easterlin Paradox?. Journal of Development Economics 86(1): 22-42.
Dolan P, Peasgood T, White M (2008) Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated to subjective well-being. Journal of economic Psychology 29: 94-122.
Easterlin RA (1995) Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27(1): 35-47.
Easterlin RA (2009) Lost in transition: Life satisfaction on the road to capitalism. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 71(2): 130-145.
Easterlin RA Angelescu L, Zweig JS (2011) The impact of modern economic growth on urban-rural differences in subjective well-being. World Development 39(12): 2187-2198.
Easterlin RA, McVey LA., Switek M, Sawangfa O, Zweig JS (2010) The happiness–income paradox revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(52): 22463-22468.
Easterlin RA, Plagnol AC (2008) Life satisfaction and economic conditions in East and West Germany pre-and post-unification. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 68(3): 433-444.
Frey WH, Stutzer A (2000) Happiness, economy and institutions. The Economic Journal 110: 918-938.
Glaeser EL (2011) Triumph of the city: how our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier New York: The Penguin Press
Glaeser EL Gottlieb JD, Ziv O (2104) Unhappy cities, Journal of Labor Economics, forthcoming.
Glaeser EL, Kahn ME (2010) The greenness of cities: carbon dioxide emissions and urban development. Journal of urban economics 67(3): 404-418.
Guriev S, Zhuravskaya E (2009) (Un)happiness in transition. Journal of Economic Perspectives 23(2): 143-68.
Hayo B (2007) Happiness in transition: An empirical study on Eastern Europe. Economic Systems 31(2): 204-221.
Kallioras D, Petrakos G (2010) Industrial growth, economic integration and structural change: evidence from the EU new member-states regions. The Annals of Regional Science 45(3): 667-680.
Knight J, Gunatilaka R (2010) The rural--urban divide in China: Income but not happiness? Journal of Development Studies 46: 506-534.
Lelkes O (2006) Knowing what is good for you: Empirical analysis of personal preferences and the “objective good”. The Journal of Socio-Economics 35(2): 285-307.
Lenzi C, Perucca G (2016) Life satisfaction across cities: evidence from Romania. Journal of Development Studies DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2015.1113265.
Puga D (2010) The magnitude and causes of agglomeration economies. Journal of Regional Science 50(1): 203-219.
Rodríguez-Pose A, Maslauskaite K (2012) Can policy make us happier? Individual characteristics, socio-economic factors and life satisfaction in Central and Eastern Europe. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 5(1): 77-96.
Sanfey P, Teksoz U (2007) Does transition make you happy?. Economics of Transition 15(4): 707-731.
Suditu B, Ginavar A, Muică A, Iordăchescu C, Vârdol A, Ghinea B (2010) Urban sprawl characteristics and typologies in Romania. Human Geographies 4(2): 79-87.
Copyright (c) 2016 Camilla Lenzi, Giovanni Perucca
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
REGION is an open journal, and uses the standard Creative Commons license: Copyright We want authors to retain the maximum control over their work consistent with the first goal. For this reason, authors who publish in REGION will release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license. This license allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given to REGION and the authors. For details of the rights authors grant users of their work, see the "human-readable summary" of the license, with a link to the full license. (Note that "you" refers to a user, not an author, in the summary.) Upon submission, the authors agree that the following three items are true: 1) The manuscript named above: a) represents valid work and neither it nor any other that I have written with substantially similar content has been published before in any form except as a preprint, b) is not concurrently submitted to another publication, and c) does not infringe anyone’s copyright. The Author(s) holds ERSA, WU, REGION, and the Editors of REGION harmless against all copyright claims. d) I have, or a coauthor has, had sufficient access to the data to verify the manuscript’s scientific integrity. 2) If asked, I will provide or fully cooperate in providing the data on which the manuscript is based so the editors or their assignees can examine it (where possible) 3) For papers with more than one author, I as the submitter have the permission of the coauthors to submit this work, and all authors agree that the corresponding author will be the main correspondent with the editorial office, and review the edited manuscript and proof. If there is only one author, I will be the corresponding author and agree to handle these responsibilities.